Archive Mode Read only · 2004–2008 |
5/18 News |
293 views |
| #11 | |||||
| |||||
|
another reason I'm glad soccer is here. Between football season and soccer season, there's only 3 months I have to let politics enter the mind. With the state of affairs both republican and democrat, that's 3 months too long.
| |||||
| #12 | |||||
| |||||
|
Quote:
Will they be named the Salt Lake Twins of Sandy? It's a little depressing to think that we are dumber than the people that elected Jesse Ventura governor. | |||||
| #13 | |||||
| |||||
|
Sandy has outmaneuvered Salt Lake City--that's the bottom line.
The SLC Council decided to wait-and-see on a stadium, and Sandy has jumped in to take the lead. Nothing is decided, of course, but you have to think that RSL is in a much stronger position when yet another city is proposing a deal for our soccer stadium. Uncle Dave says he's looking to announce something in the late summer. Should be interesting over the next few months. | |||||
| #14 | |||||
| |||||
|
Quote:
__________________
An empty stomach is not a good political advisor. | |||||
| #15 | |||||
| |||||
|
The deal seems to be pretty good... Consider this: SLC plan: have the City buy the land and a TRAX stop and have the County pass a bond for 50% of the brick and mortar;
Sandy plan: buy the land with the parking structure money, probably have to buy a TRAX stop at 9400S, and no bond...instead an entertainment/hotel tax for 50% of the brick, Checketts to do the last 50%. Due to no need to go to the actual taxpayers for approval, the second deal has a better chance of getting done. There is concern that the bond would not pass due to the bad press from earlier this spring, so Sandy and the County are trying to circumvent the taxpayers. Maybe bad for County citizens, but good for RSL. Deuce...remember, the SLC Counsel was on board to purchase the land for the stadium, it wasn't until their funding source was pulled that they had to back off...(inside sources say) if SLC had the money for the land, they would already have an agreement done. | |||||
| #16 | |||||
| |||||
| #17 | |||||
| |||||
|
Quote:
Bold statement. He'll be back on Sat. for goals 96 and 97, I'm sure. We planning a special something for 100 if it's at home? | |||||
| #18 | |||||
| |||||
|
Quote:
| |||||
| #19 | |||||
| |||||
|
From the Provo Herald - RSL Looking for more Payback
http://www.heraldextra.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=55270&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 Is it just me, or does anyone else think the Provo Herald has had lousy coverage overall of RSL? I just reviewed Jason Franchuk's articles - how can that paper even survive with such a negative, pessimistic sports writer? | |||||
| #20 | |||||
| |||||
|
Quote:
Provo has a paper? | |||||